Showing posts with label PHARMACY-RULES. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PHARMACY-RULES. Show all posts

14.5.14

40 / Canadian Foundation for Pharmacy said: your examples would constitute fraud / March 11, 2011

Dayle Acorn ;
On Friday, March 11, 2011 11:44 PM, Dayle Acorn wrote:


Hi Mr. Mohammadpour,

The nature of your questions has nothing to do with the Foundation’s work in Canada. As a result I am not in a position, nor am I qualified to respond. Sadly, many of your examples would constitute fraud by those involved. I don’t know the consequences.
Regards
Dayle
 
From: bagher mohammadpour [mailto:bmp1337@yahoo.com]
Sent: March 11, 2011 8:05 AM
To: dacorn@cfpnet.ca
Subject: Fw: The Canadian Foundation for Pharmacy
  ___________________________________________________________
Dear Mr. Dayle Acorn,
Executive Director of The Canadian Foundation for Pharmacy

As a colleague and pharmacist I expected your reply has been received till now! If you do not intend to reply my letter, please let me know.

Sincerely yours
BMP
 

 
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: bagher mohammadpour
To: dacorn@cfpnet.ca
Sent: Fri, October 29, 2010 5:31:00 PM
Subject: The Canadian Foundation for Pharmacy



Dear Mr. Dayle Acorn,
Executive Director of The Canadian Foundation for Pharmacy

I am an Iranian pharmacist with more than 20 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industries of Iran.


The following list is not a sample, it shows the NATURE of nearly all activities which are needed to be done in a typical pharmaceutical company to be a pharmaceutical company, in nearly all domestic manufacturers of medicinals in Iran. As a colleague of you from a remote country, I like to know professional, scientific, and legal assessment and evaluation of of your proffessional organisation on them and that National System (including Ministry of Health) which supports them. What would be the consequences of such mistakes in Canada according to current law and regulations for such manufactures and officials?

§- Usage delicate and unstable materials like vitamins five to seven years after the end of their Expiration Dates.
§- Huge mistakes in laboratory control methods of Raw Materials and finished products so that mistakes up to fifty percent, and usually more, could not be detected or could be introduced.
§- Mixing of raw well water with syrups for too many years because of a design defect in the filling machine.
§- correction of a totally wrong manufacturing procedure reduced the manufacturing time from ten hours in tow days to three hours in one day. A further correction of its formulation reduced its excipients about 1300 kg per 3000 l: this means their ignorance put the metabolic system of children under a severe pressure for absolutely no benefit or necessity. Its bitter taste and disgusting smell vanished for ever.
§- Defect in installation of a washing machine  led to remaining about two milliliters of an extremely concentrated Chlorine water, one of the most dangerous Oxidizing agents, in the washed bottles used for bottling the above mentioned pediatric antibiotic suspension.
§- Usage an totally Inactive microbial preservative in an antacid suspension for too many years for the complete ignorance of the most basic principles of chemistry and biology.
§- For a while a company introduced a preparation without any Active component (drug molecules) into market for Economical reasons.
§- Active ingredient of an antacid suspension and tablets were respectively 25% and 16% less than the label amounts in at least two company.
§- In a comprehensive report, in more than one hundred pages, I proved that nearly what I knew till then in that company were wrong to the strongest and widest meaning of the word of wrong.
§- And there are too many other cases which I could not mention them for ,at least, the matter of space.
§- correction of filtering technique of a sugar syrup prevented the entrance of considerable amount of any kinds of particles into a pediatric antibiotic suspension.
§- Some people died in a hospital in Tehran under the usage of an imported general anesthetic for the wrong quality control process in the Central QC Laboratory of MoH.
§- Some imported blood preparations by a governmental department infected too many by HIV because of the poor QC methods employed by MoH.
§- A manufacturer sent seven files to MoH to gain production licenses. My comprehensive analysis proved that they were ABSOLUTLY, in the strongest meaning of the word, wrong and no one can find even a scientific or literal sentences in ALL of them. Many correspondences from MoH proved and yet proves that none of those huge and disastrous mistakes were detected by MoH officials or many pharmacist employees oh that company. Some of those drugs were Cardiac and anti-Asthmatic.
§- All bottles of a Pediatric dried suspension of Doxycycline released to market in spite of being degradated because of the high humidity of filling department.
§- Contaminated injectables (Oxytertracycline) with DUST of Carbon during the sealing step, released to market by the previous case company.
§- A hyperosmotic local anesthetic which was prepared by a governmental agent paralyzed some, especially from both legs following its injection into the spinal cord.
§- Washings and rain water entered the main water reservoir of a company for an unknown period of time in spite of repeated inspections of MoH agents and too many pseudo-pharmacist employees during in all those long years.

I believe that you mention this letter and its content Strictly confidential and professional as your reply would be considered so.

Thank you for your attention, time and kindness. I am eagerly looking forward to hear from you as soon as possible. Your favour would not be forgotten and I am in grat need of your guidance.

Faithfully your
B Mohammad pour,
Pharm. D.
bmp1337@yahoo.com


 
 

30 / Policy and Strategic Planning Division: Insp_pol@hc-sc.gc.ca / Jan. 20, 2011 / CANADA


On Thursday, January 20, 2011 2:47 PM, bagher mohammadpour wrote:

Policy and Strategic Planning Division 

Insp_pol@hc-sc.gc.ca ;


Dear Madam /Sir

I am an Iranian pharmacist with more than 20 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industries of Iran .

The following list is not a sample, it shows the NATURE of nearly all activities which are needed to be done in a typical pharmaceutical company to be a pharmaceutical company, in nearly all domestic manufacturers of medicinals in Iran. As a colleague of you from a remote country, I like to know professional, scientific, and legal assessment and evaluation of of your proffessional organisation on them and that National System (including Ministry of Health) which supports them. What would be the LEGAL consequences of such mistakes in  Canada  according to current law and regulations for such manufactures and officials?§- Usage delicate and unstable materials like vitamins five to seven years after the end of their Expiration Dates.
§- Huge mistakes in laboratory control methods of Raw Materials and finished products so that mistakes up to fifty percent, and usually more, could not be detected or could be introduced.
§- Mixing of raw well water with syrups for too many years because of a design defect in the filling machine.
§- correction of a totally wrong manufacturing procedure reduced the manufacturing time from ten hours in tow days to three hours in one day. A further correction of its formulation reduced its excipients about 1300 kg per 3000 l: this means their ignorance put the metabolic system of children under a severe pressure for absolutely no benefit or necessity. Its bitter taste and disgusting smell vanished for ever.
§- Defect in installation of a washing machine  led to remaining about two milliliters of an extremely concentrated Chlorine water, one of the most dangerous Oxidizing agents, in the washed bottles used for bottling the above mentioned pediatric antibiotic suspension.
§- Usage an totally Inactive microbial preservative in an antacid suspension for too many years for the complete ignorance of the most basic principles of chemistry and biology.
§- For a while a company introduced a preparation without any Active component (drug molecules) into market for Economical reasons.
§- Active ingredient of an antacid suspension and tablets were respectively 25% and 16% less than the label amounts in at least two company.
§- In a comprehensive report, in more than one hundred pages, I proved that nearly what I knew till then in that company were wrong to the strongest and widest meaning of the word of wrong.
§- And there are too many other cases which I could not mention them for ,at least, the matter of space.
§- correction of filtering technique of a sugar syrup prevented the entrance of considerable amount of any kinds of particles into a pediatric antibiotic suspension.
§- Some people died in a hospital in Tehran under the usage of an imported general anesthetic for the wrong quality control process in the Central QC Laboratory of MoH.
§- Some imported blood preparations by a governmental department infected too many by HIV because of the poor QC methods employed by MoH.
§- A manufacturer sent seven files to MoH to gain production licenses. My comprehensive analysis proved that they were ABSOLUTLY, in the strongest meaning of the word, wrong and no one can find even a scientific or literal sentences in ALL of them. Many correspondences from MoH proved and yet proves that none of those huge and disastrous mistakes were detected by MoH officials or many pharmacist employees oh that company. Some of those drugs were Cardiac and anti-Asthmatic.
§- All bottles of a Pediatric dried suspension of Doxycycline released to market in spite of being degradated because of the high humidity of filling department.
§- Contaminated injectables (Oxytertracycline) with DUST of Carbon during the sealing step, released to market by the previous case company.
§- A hyperosmotic local anesthetic which was prepared by a governmental agent paralyzed some, especially from both legs following its injection into the spinal cord.
§- Washings and rain water entered the main water reservoir of a company for an unknown period of time in spite of repeated inspections of MoH agents and too many pseudo-pharmacist employees during in all those long years.

I believe that you mention this letter and its content Strictly confidential and professional as your reply would be considered so.

Thank you for your attention, time and kindness.

It is a vital matter to me and I am looking forward to hearing from you very soon.
I am eagerly looking forward to hear from you as soon as possible. Your favour would not be forgotten and I am in grat need of your guidance.

Faithfully your
B Mohammad pour,
Pharm. D.
bmp1337@yahoo.com


29 / GMP Inspection Unit of Health Canada / January 11, 2011 / CANADA


On Thursday, January 20, 2011 2:20 PM, GMP_Questions_BPF wrote:
(le français suit)

Thank you for contacting the Drug Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) Inspection Unit of Health Canada.

We aim to answer your questions as quickly as possible. If your inquiry is more complex or requires input from a technical committee, our response time will be longer.

Your message has been forwarded to a knowledgeable member of our staff for consideration and response.

If you do not hear from us in 20 working days, please feel free to inquire as to the status of your initial request.

Should you have any further questions related to GMP, please do not hesitate to contact the Drug GMP Inspection Unit at

Drug Good Manufacturing Practices Unit
Health Products and Food Branch Inspectorate
Health Canada
250 Lanark Avenue
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0K9
Tel: 613-957-1492
Fax: 613-957-6709
gmp_questions_bpf@hc-sc.gc.ca

Sincerely,
The Drug Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) Inspection Unit


Nous vous remercions d’avoir contacté l’Unité d’inspection des bonnes pratiques de fabrication (BPF) des médicaments de Santé Canada.

Nous tentons de répondre à vos questions le plus rapidement possible. Cependant, nos délais peuvent être plus longs si votre question est plus complexe ou nécessite l'avis de notre comité technique.

Nous avons fait parvenir votre message à un membre bien renseigné de notre personnel, afin qu’il l’étudie et y réponde.

N'hésitez pas à communiquer avec nous si vous ne recevez pas une réponse dans 20 jours ouvrables.

Si vous avez toute autre question reliée aux BPF, veuillez ne pas hésiter à communiquer avec l’Unité d’Inspection BPF des médicaments, aux coordonnées suivantes:

Santé Canada
Inspectorat de la Direction générale des produits de santé et des aliments
Unité d'inspection des bonnes pratiques de fabrication des médicaments
250, avenue Lanark
Ottawa (Ontario)
K1A 0K9
Tél: 613-957-1492
Télecopieur: 613-957-6709
gmp_questions_bpf@hc-sc.gc.ca


Veuillez agréer nos sincères salutations,
L’Unité d’Inspection bonnes pratiques de fabrication (BPF) des médicaments

28 / FDA: Adulterated drugs and devices / January 20, 2011 / U.S.A


http://law.justia.com/us/codes/title21/21usc351.html

§ 351. —  Adulterated drugs and devices.
From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access
[wais.access.gpo.gov]
[Laws in effect as of January 24, 2002]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
  January 24, 2002 and December 19, 2002]
 [CITE: 21USC351]
 
TITLE 21--FOOD AND DRUGSCHAPTER 9--FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, AND COSMETIC ACT
SUBCHAPTER V--DRUGS AND DEVICESPart A--Drugs and Devices
_____________________________________
Sec. 351. Adulterated drugs and devices
________________________________________ 
A drug shall be deemed to be adulterated--

(a) Poisonous, insanitary, etc., ingredients; adequate controls in 
        manufacture

    (1) If it consists in whole or in part of any filthy, putrid, or 
decomposed substance; or (2)(A) if it has been prepared, packed, or held 
under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been contaminated with 
filth, or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health; or (B) 
if it is a drug and the methods used in, or the facilities or controls 
used for, its manufacture, processing, packing, or holding do not 
conform to or are not operated or administered in conformity with 
current good manufacturing practice to assure that such drug meets the 
requirements of this chapter as to safety and has the identity and 
strength, and meets the quality and purity characteristics, which it 
purports or is represented to possess; or (C) if it is a compounded 
positron emission tomography drug and the methods used in, or the 
facilities and controls used for, its compounding, processing, packing, 
or holding do not conform to or are not operated or administered in 
conformity with the positron emission tomography compounding standards 
and the official monographs of the United States Pharmacopoeia to assure 
that such drug meets the requirements of this chapter as to safety and 
has the identity and strength, and meets the quality and purity 
characteristics, that it purports or is represented to possess; or (3) 
if its container is composed, in whole or in part, of any poisonous or 
deleterious substance which may render the contents injurious to health; 
or (4) if (A) it bears or contains, for purposes of coloring only, a 
color additive which is unsafe within the meaning of section 379e(a) of 
this title, or (B) it is a color additive the intended use of which in 
or on drugs or devices is for purposes of coloring only and is unsafe 
within the meaning of section 379e(a) of this title; or (5) if it is a 
new animal drug which is unsafe within the meaning of section 360b of 
this title; or (6) if it is an animal feed bearing or containing a new 
animal drug, and such animal feed is unsafe within the meaning of 
section 360b of this title.

(b) Strength, quality, or purity differing from official compendium

    If it purports to be or is represented as a drug the name of which 
is recognized in an official compendium, and its strength differs from, 
or its quality or purity falls below, the standard set forth in such 
compendium. Such determination as to strength, quality, or purity shall 
be made in accordance with the tests or methods of assay set forth in 
such compendium, except that whenever tests or methods of assay have not 
been prescribed in such compendium, or such tests or methods of assay as 
are prescribed are, in the judgment of the Secretary, insufficient for 
the making of such determination, the Secretary shall bring such fact to 
the attention of the appropriate body charged with the revision of such 
compendium, and if such body fails within a reasonable time to prescribe 
tests or methods of assay which, in the judgment of the Secretary, are 
sufficient for purposes of this paragraph, then the Secretary shall 
promulgate regulations prescribing appropriate tests or methods of assay 
in accordance with which such determination as to strength, quality, or 
purity shall be made. No drug defined in an official compendium shall be 
deemed to be adulterated under this paragraph because it differs from 
the standard of strength, quality, or purity therefor set forth in such 
compendium, if its difference in strength, quality, or purity from such 
standard is plainly stated on its label. Whenever a drug is recognized 
in both the United States Pharmacopoeia and the Homoeopathic 
Pharmacopoeia of the United States it shall be subject to the 
requirements of the United States Pharmacopoeia unless it is labeled and 
offered for sale as a homoeopathic drug, in which case it shall be 
subject to the provisions of the Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the 
United States and not to those of the United States Pharmacopoeia.

(c) Misrepresentation of strength, etc., where drug is unrecognized in 
        compendium

    If it is not subject to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this 
section and its strength differs from, or its purity or quality falls 
below, that which it purports or is represented to possess.

(d) Mixture with or substitution of another substance

    If it is a drug and any substance has been (1) mixed or packed 
therewith so as to reduce its quality or strength or (2) substituted 
wholly or in part therefor.

 wais.access.gpo.gov]
[Laws in effect as of January 24, 2002]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
  January 24, 2002 and December 19, 2002]
[CITE: 21USC351]

 
                        TITLE 21--FOOD AND DRUGS
 
             CHAPTER 9--FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, AND COSMETIC ACT
 
                     SUBCHAPTER V--DRUGS AND DEVICES
 
                        Part A--Drugs and Devices
 


Sec. 351. Adulterated drugs and devices

    A drug or device shall be deemed to be adulterated--

(a) Poisonous, insanitary, etc., ingredients; adequate controls in 
        manufacture

    (1) If it consists in whole or in part of any filthy, putrid, or 
decomposed substance; or (2)(A) if it has been prepared, packed, or held 
under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been contaminated with 
filth, or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health; or (B) 
if it is a drug and the methods used in, or the facilities or controls 
used for, its manufacture, processing, packing, or holding do not 
conform to or are not operated or administered in conformity with 
current good manufacturing practice to assure that such drug meets the 
requirements of this chapter as to safety and has the identity and 
strength, and meets the quality and purity characteristics, which it 
purports or is represented to possess; or (C) if it is a compounded 
positron emission tomography drug and the methods used in, or the 
facilities and controls used for, its compounding, processing, packing, 
or holding do not conform to or are not operated or administered in 
conformity with the positron emission tomography compounding standards 
and the official monographs of the United States Pharmacopoeia to assure 
that such drug meets the requirements of this chapter as to safety and 
has the identity and strength, and meets the quality and purity 
characteristics, that it purports or is represented to possess; or (3) 
if its container is composed, in whole or in part, of any poisonous or 
deleterious substance which may render the contents injurious to health; 
or (4) if (A) it bears or contains, for purposes of coloring only, a 
color additive which is unsafe within the meaning of section 379e(a) of 
this title, or (B) it is a color additive the intended use of which in 
or on drugs or devices is for purposes of coloring only and is unsafe 
within the meaning of section 379e(a) of this title; or (5) if it is a 
new animal drug which is unsafe within the meaning of section 360b of 
this title; or (6) if it is an animal feed bearing or containing a new 
animal drug, and such animal feed is unsafe within the meaning of 
section 360b of this title.

(b) Strength, quality, or purity differing from official compendium

    If it purports to be or is represented as a drug the name of which 
is recognized in an official compendium, and its strength differs from, 
or its quality or purity falls below, the standard set forth in such 
compendium. Such determination as to strength, quality, or purity shall 
be made in accordance with the tests or methods of assay set forth in 
such compendium, except that whenever tests or methods of assay have not 
been prescribed in such compendium, or such tests or methods of assay as 
are prescribed are, in the judgment of the Secretary, insufficient for 
the making of such determination, the Secretary shall bring such fact to 
the attention of the appropriate body charged with the revision of such 
compendium, and if such body fails within a reasonable time to prescribe 
tests or methods of assay which, in the judgment of the Secretary, are 
sufficient for purposes of this paragraph, then the Secretary shall 
promulgate regulations prescribing appropriate tests or methods of assay 
in accordance with which such determination as to strength, quality, or 
purity shall be made. No drug defined in an official compendium shall be 
deemed to be adulterated under this paragraph because it differs from 
the standard of strength, quality, or purity therefor set forth in such 
compendium, if its difference in strength, quality, or purity from such 
standard is plainly stated on its label. Whenever a drug is recognized 
in both the United States Pharmacopoeia and the Homoeopathic 
Pharmacopoeia of the United States it shall be subject to the 
requirements of the United States Pharmacopoeia unless it is labeled and 
offered for sale as a homoeopathic drug, in which case it shall be 
subject to the provisions of the Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the 
United States and not to those of the United States Pharmacopoeia.

(c) Misrepresentation of strength, etc., where drug is unrecognized in 
        compendium

    If it is not subject to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this 
section and its strength differs from, or its purity or quality falls 
below, that which it purports or is represented to possess.

(d) Mixture with or substitution of another substance

    If it is a drug and any substance has been (1) mixed or packed 
therewith so as to reduce its quality or strength or (2) substituted 
wholly or in part therefor.